______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-01 |
Dan Pabon, et al v. Andrew Luxen |
|
| Petitioner | Respondent | |
| Petitioners seek a ruling that Respondent has no authority to place a hold on approved funds. Respondent argues he was fulfilling his constitutional duty as Legislative Council President and his obligations under the student fee regulations by preventing the purchase of items that he believed were luxury items as defined under Section 2.3.5 of the Student Fee Regulations. | ||
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-02 |
Brian Freeman, et al v. Andrew Luxen |
|
| Petitioner | Respondent | |
| Petitioners have requested that we permanently enjoin Mr. Luxen from freezing their pay. In the alternative, the Petitioners request that we grant a temporary restraining order enjoining the Respondent from freezing their pay until such time as the court can fully consider the merits of granting a permanent injunction. | ||
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-03
Dissenting Opinion |
In re Gravy |
|
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-04Court Notice of Withdrawal
of Appeal |
Gravy, et al. v. Election Comm'n |
|
| Petitioners | Respondent | |
| Petitioners appeal the decision of the Election Comm'n in issuing an infraction against Gravy and Gravy Candidates for placing an ad in the Colorado Daily. | ||
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-05 |
Meadors v. Election Comm'n |
|
| Petitioner | Respondent | |
| Petitioners have requested that we issue a Temporary Restraining Order under Appellate Court Rule 29 because of irreparable harm resulting from the declaration of the UCSU Spring 2000 Elections as final. | ||
Case Documents: |
Resolution: | |
| May 1,
2000 Order I-Vote Review Letter Petitioner's TRO Brief Request for Injunction I-Vote Allegations |
The Order of May 1, 2000, is vacated. There are no appeals pending before the Court challenging the election results. The Spring 2000 Election results are final. All elected candidates shall take office as previously setout. | |
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SP-06 |
Luxen v. UCSU |
|
| Petitioner | Respondent | |
| Petitioners seek an injunction against the UCSU Election Commission from changing the vote tallies of the Spring 2000 Election to the final results pending a thorough investigation into all matters of the Spring 2000 Election by UCSU Legislative Council. | ||
Case Documents: |
Resolution: | |
| Request
for Injunction Minute Entry Dismissing Case |
Petitioners failed to timely submit the appeal. This Court has no jurisdiction except to dismiss the Petitioners’ appeal. It is incumbent on the Petitioners to apply for any equitable relief. | |
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SU-01(updated June 19, 2000) |
Vise, Avila v. ASSG |
|
| Petitioner | Respondent | |
| Petitioners
request that the UCSU Appellate Court overturn the
opinion of the ASSG Court which overturned the Spring
2000 ASSG Election results and ordered a new election. On appeal from the ASSG Court |
||
Case Documents: |
Resolution: | |
| Appeal Respondent's Response Brief Petitioner's Reply Brief Case Management Order Interrogatories Petitioner's Answer Respondent's Answer Pre-Trial Hearing Order Index of Record on Appeal |
[ Case Pending ] | |
______________________________________________________________________
2000-SU-02 |
In re Beauchemin |
|
| Petitioners seek a reversal of Wardenburg Student Insurance fees. | ||
Case Documents: |
Resolution: | |
| Appeal Decision *.doc |
Appeal
is Denied
|
|
______________________________________________________________________